🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive phone calls continued. At first, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, later from the police themselves. Finally, a local artisan asserts he was called to the police station and told clearly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is among those opposing a multimillion-dollar project where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – will be razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is unparalleled in the globe," explains the protester. "But they want to eradicate our community and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of Dharavi present a dramatic difference to the high-rise structures and elite residences that loom over the settlement. Homes are assembled randomly and frequently missing basic amenities, unregulated industries emit toxic smoke and the atmosphere is filled with the overpowering odor of exposed drainage.

To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and apartments with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future achieved.

"We don't have adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or sewage systems and there's nowhere for youth to recreate," says A Selvin Nadar, in his fifties, who migrated from southern India in the early eighties. "The only way is to tear it all down and provide modern residences."

Local Protest

Yet certain residents, including this protester, are fighting against the redevelopment.

All recognize that this community, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. However they worry that this project – absent of public consultation – might turn premium city property into a playground for the rich, displacing the marginalized, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

It was these marginalized, relocated individuals who established the uninhabited area into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose output is worth between a significant amount and $2m annually, making it a major unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Out of about 1 million inhabitants living in the dense sprawling zone, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Additional residents will be relocated to undeveloped zones and salt plains on the distant periphery of the city, risking fragment a historic community. Certain individuals will be denied homes at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in Dharavi will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the natural, shared lifestyle of dwelling and laboring that has sustained the community for so long.

Commercial activities from garment work to pottery and recycling are expected to reduce in scale and be moved to an allocated "business area" distant from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

In the case of the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to call home this community, the project presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, three-floor operation makes garments – formal jackets, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – sold in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

Relatives dwells in the spaces underneath and his workers and tailors – workers from other states – live there, enabling him to sustain operations. Outside the slum, housing costs are frequently 10 times more expensive for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the official facilities in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan depicts a contrasting perspective. Well-groomed residents gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, buying international baked goods and breakfast items and having coffee on a terrace adjacent to Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that supports the neighborhood.

"This isn't progress for residents," explains Shaikh. "It represents a huge land development that will render it impossible for us to survive."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the development company. Run by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it denies.

Even as local authorities labels it a joint project, the corporation contributed $950m for its majority share. A case claiming that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the corporation is being considered in the top court.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to vocally oppose the development, protesters and community members claim they have been experienced an extended period of coercion and warning – involving messages, explicit warnings and implications that opposing the initiative was equivalent to opposing national interests – by people they claim work for the corporate group.

Part of the group alleged to have making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c