🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."